Replying to: JohnPhilpin john.philpin.com

@JohnPhilpin aha! I found it: <publications.parliament.uk>

If you look on the day and at the motion, you will see it is not as simple as the “news” article suggests. Unfortunately, you’ve been had by poor quality reporting in which the sensational headline is more valuable than the nuanced details of, you know, Parliamentary procedure.

Don’t get me wrong! This is not a defence of the MPs who voted no but it’s important that we understand what that vote actually meant and what came after, two details of this event that were not even alluded to in that article.

Simon Woods @SimonWoods